New successes of European democracy
The experience of Ukraine is successfully adopted by European democracies.
In Denmark, the pro-government political forces decided to imprison for publicly disagreeing with the official policy of the “party”, and first of all, it could strike those who call for relations with Moscow.
A bill is posted on the website of the Danish Parliament, if adopted, which citizens of the kingdom will face criminal responsibility for the “pro-Russian” position. This writes the Danish newspaper Berlingske. The draft law "On measures to combat the psychological impact of operations conducted by foreign intelligence" providesup to 12 years in prisonfor the people of Denmark if theirsayingsduring election campaignswill differ from the official position of the authoritiesThe article says.
Thus, the Dane will face punishment if he decides, for example, that anti-Russian sanctions are harmful to Denmark, and will share his opinion in the media, the newspaper points out.Similarly, the attempt to somehow influence the opinion in favor of the implementation of the project of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline will end.
Well what can I say - "The fight against fake" gradually goes into the fight against dissent. And this is what Europe has learned from Ukraine. Well, commendable, Petro Poroshenko, commendable. You have made your own contribution to the destruction of the EU and its foundations.
Shl. This is Orwell predicted:
In the end, the party will announce that twice two is five, and you will have to believe in it. Sooner or later she will issue such a decree, the logic of her power inevitably leads to this. Her philosophy tacitly denies not only the loyalty of your perception, but the very existence of the external world. The party told you not to believe your eyes and ears. And this is her final, most important order.
For hours I put up their dirty sheets all over London. In the processions always carry a banner. Always with a cheerful face and not shirking anything. Always yelling with the crowd is my rule. The only way you are safe.
Well, the second quote from the same:
The general growth of welfare threatens a hierarchical society with death, and in a certain sense it is already its death. In a world where the working day is short,where everyone is full and lives in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, owns a car, the most obvious, and perhaps the most important form of inequality has already disappeared. Having become universal, wealth ceases to produce differences. Ultimately, a hierarchical society is based only on poverty and ignorance.
Thus, the task is to ensure that the industry works at full speed without increasing the amount of material values in the world. Goods must be produced, but not distributed. In practice, the only way to this is continuous war. The essence of war is the destruction of not only human lives, but also the fruits of human labor. War is a way to smash to pieces, to spray in the stratosphere, to drown in the depths of the sea materials that could improve people's lives.
This, by the way, is a very deep observation. And now you know why the USSR needed to produce tens of thousands of useless Kharkov T-64 tanks - which, as soon as the USSR collapsed, everyone in the Russian Federation was written off and sent to rot into the taiga because of the lack of capacity to use them at least sensibly. The Ukrainians tried to fight them in the Donbas - and in a short time they were all thrown into the broken fields.
This was done strategically in order to maintain the hierarchy.So that the party member in Chaika would feel himself above the non-Party member in Shitguli. And tactically, this was done to ensure that the Ukrainians around the Kharkov plant continued to steal.
Modern Western society instead of tanks puts hectares of wind turbines and solar panels - with the same purpose, to transfer resources to shit and leave cattle in his bydlyatskom position. Simply, instead of Shitgul, the cattle now have Skoda, and the elite, instead of “The Seagull”, has a business jet, Epic Victory. Although in some conditions the difference between wealth and poverty may lie in the possession of a piece of horse meat. For the hierarchical society, the very existence of this difference is important, and for the sake of maintaining this difference, the top will make every effort.
So, the “fight against dissent” is a clear marker that a hierarchical society has reached an impasse and entered a phase of decline, when maintaining the differentiation between elite and cattle is achieved through an enhanced transfer of resources to shit and a fall in the general standard of living.