Postmodern Speaking. To be free
Remember the modernity creed "Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite"? Or do you even believe it? Yes, many believe. But especially for those in the postmodern have replaced the meanings of words. This is not the freedom at all; to be free now means something completely different.
"Free from"- this is now in a new discourse such our “Our goal is communism”. Shining peaks, where everyone will be free from everything. Full and final liberation of mankind.
It is important to note that"Freedom from"here will be inappropriate. “Freedom” is a general category, its very recognition speaks of the existence of a community for which this category is a reality. And being imprisoned in any community, you are not free from it.Then you are not free. And you should befree. Therefore only"Free from"- it is an individual quality, for everyone, for everyoneseparatelybut not forof all.
A modern European and an American are already free from much. From racial prejudices, from gender inequality, from hate speech, from ... (I suppose, the idea of the West was invented by creators from the advertising business. Caffeine free, fat free, sugar free. For politics and philosophy, it was just slightly edited.)
Thirsty citizens march cheerfully along the streets and demand to free them from something else.
Thought why the movement of non-childbearinggenerally existscalledchildfree? Could be called differently: "those who get a lot of pleasure from life, a lot of free time ..." But no.
They are free from children. After all, they are not the acquisition put in the title, and the loss.
Freedom is an acquisition. By definition, relevant from the ancient Greeks to the last century. According to it, freedom gives opportunity, the path.
But the magic word"Free"changes everything. For them, the situation is turned upside down. Theypurchasedfreedom.Freedom from.
There is actually such a lot. Vegans, for example, or non-drinkers. And all of these are not a community, there is a unifying center in the community. And these have a hole there, an emptiness. The absence of a sign does not unite. Therefore they do not have therefreedom, they have each one therefree from. And no movement for liberation from wearing skirts or pants will be a community, a social group, or a public institution.
Ideafree fromyoung, evil, and full of strength. Unhappy prepare to release more from much.
You will be free from the need to own a car - an automatic taxi will carry you everywhere.You will be free from the purchase of expensive electricity - solar panels and Tesla batteries. (At the same time, you can get rid of the construction of complex and terrible nuclear power plants.) You will be free from the purchases of things - print them on a 3D printer!
The author of the “Eleven Satanic Rules on the Earth” Anton LaVey understood these things :)
This is an important reservation about the burden. If you want to take someone's goods, you can always convince the owner that she is only to his detriment. And to release, he also remains grateful.
Modern apparatus of disinformation and suppression of thinking is very easy to convince the masses in any delusion. People after all now believe that they are vital marriages of homosexuals. And theyfreed uptheir prejudices against homosexuals.
And here is also an interesting moment. Any attempt to replace one person’s conviction with another (opposite) is like trying to fill a bowl with water when it is filled with milk. It is not crowded out so easily.It takes a very long time to dilute or drastically from the hose, it will take a lot of water anyway ... It's easier to pour the milk first. And a good way for this isdeclare persuasion a prejudice. And then urgebreak freeFrom him. So it works, yes. And this is called "values."
Here is the purest product of the propaganda of "values":
The man is demanding the release of his schools, hospitals, work and pensions:
"Values" they cram in exchange for everything that they have and what can be, in exchange for all freedoms.
And “prejudices” still exist quite a lot. Children are best with their parents, and parents will educate them better. Religious morality. Any moral. Imperial prejudices again.
By the way, exemption from the burden of property also entails the opportunity to get rid of unnecessary knowledge. The burden of ownership does exist. Buying an iron, you must learn to use it so that the house does not burn at least. The owner of the car is minimally versed in his device and has the freedom to study it thoroughly.Freedom for. And why know this if you are freed from the car? Knowledge in that new world will require very, very little.
And what is there in the end for these free people?
Completely free people should be free from all beliefs, prejudices, from all taboos, from all things, from all higher goals, from meanings. They will not have any rights either. Having the right is first to have the conviction of one’s ownfreedom for. Instead of rights there will be “unlimited opportunities”. It is clear that there may be opportunities for a person who has nothing neither for his soul, nor for the soul - none.
In the first place, this will mean that these people, by their property and legal status, will become a slave class.
Secondly, in a social position, these people will fall into a social position that has never been encountered in the history of mankind. At the very minimum level of development we had a tribal system. The development of societies is the development and expansion of horizontal ties in them. People free from everything will be free from all connections in society. They just won't have anything to do with others. Link basedlack ofbeliefs, actions, family, property are impossible.
It is even lower than a schooling or solitary animal. These have status and connections in their communities.And the people of the future will be like stall cattle. The cows, although they stand next to the drinker, are near each other. Is that shove, but you need to behate free. Cows have no calves. They bring them, of course, when the owner needs them, but they have nothing to do with them. The cows have nothing.
Yes, the stall may seem rather large. Every cattle will, on weekdays, call an automatic taxi and go to work, and on weekends - to the mall. Only after all, housing, work, and the mall are set by the owner of the stall, and not the brute chooses these paths for themselves.
And if the brute gets sad, it has already been proposed in the Netherlands.Be free from your poor life.The reason can be called dissatisfaction with life. And only the beast is to blame for this.
. A working person did not have enough wages even for food. (The matter is not at all in particulars, not in the cost of rent, not in the level of salary.) The society told her that it does not have opportunities for survival in this particular society, that it lost the struggle for existence. She is guilty herself. But she hasfreedom from.